CERN Truth
1st extinction event:Leaked CERN documents state LHC has 70% chances to produce strangelets on 11/9
Published: September 11, 2010
Abstract. We have received and will show in this article astonishing documents leaked out of CERN internal servers, about the CASTOR project, a Centauro and STrangelet Object Research to hunt for strangelets ‘likely‘ to be produced at the LHC.
According to those internal documents CERN has been lying for years to the press and in the suits, since it always affirmed that it won’t produce the ultra-dangerous, ultradense ‘strangelets’, the liquid explosive made of up, down and strange quarks, responsible of the ice-9 reactions that cause supernovas (below’s graph).
In those documents CERN affirms there is a 65-70% of chances of producing negative strangelets, which according to standard science on strangelets today, will provoke the ice-9 reaction (name taken from Cat and Cradle’s book in which a physicist destroys the world throwing a new type of water that freezes the planet, since an ice-9 reaction will condensate the planet in a 15 kilometers ultra-dense strange star).
Thus CERN has been lying and it is playing with all mankind a Quantum Russian Roulette game with 4 shots out of 6, 66% chances of extinction. This will be even if we survive the biggest genocide of history, calculated multiplying probability and victims: 66% x 6.6 billions=4.4 billions, 1000 times the Holocaust. The experiment will start in 45 days now. We might be living the last month of our existence as individuals and as a species. This Fall can be indeed the Fall of Man. And yet, the experiment is not stopped. This machine is too big to fail. Ave Caesar Hauer, morituri te salutant…
11/9: Strangelets (Informative film)
also see: 11/9: Strangelets (surrealist film)
(Was the intro really necessary?)
Dr. Walter L. Wagner discusses the potential destruction of our planet earth by creating micro black holes and strangelets with the LHC. He indicates the current CERN safety reports are seriously flawed and contain unacceptable risks.
For example, if micro black holes are created, which CERN estimates about 1 micro black hole every second, the effects of this experiment may be months to years after the first LHC collisions.
These people in charge of the LHC lack self-preservation instincts in similar way, like many sectarians. No evidence or theory would convince them about LHC disaster, until it really happens...
They are breaking the Precautionary Principle : http://en.wikipwiki/Precauti...edia.org/
These LHC scientists willingly want to create black holes.......without knowing full well the consequences...
Dr. Rossler's website is lhcfacts.org
Dr. Wagner's website is lhcdefense.org
5 Comments:
"condensate" - it's condense. You see, that undermines the whole argument right there...
Don't get me started on this one, I'm busy trying to learn how to walk like an Eqyptian.
Dean- The terminology might be correct in terms of strangelet formation in sciencespeak. It isn't a reference to condensation as it is normally considered.
Or, maybe the author isn't entirely conversant in English. Either way, it's beside the point, isn't it? After all, WE'RE ALL FIXING TO DIE...
The more you shall honor Me,
the more I shall bless you.
-the Infant Jesus of Prague
(<- Czech Republic, next to Russia)
trustNjesus ALWAYS, dear,
and wiseabove to Seventh-Heaven...
cuzz the only other realm aint too cool.
God bless your indelible soul.
The more you shall honor Me,
the more I shall bless you.
-the Infant Jesus of Prague
(<- Czech Republic, next to Russia)
trustNjesus ALWAYS, dear,
and wiseabove to Seventh-Heaven...
cuzz the only other realm aint too cool.
God bless your indelible soul.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home